You’ve probably heard of the reference: people calling you a banana just because you do not speak their language. Strictly speaking, a banana is someone who is of oriental ancestry, who doesn’t speak an oriental dialect or is not familiar with their ancestor’s culture.
Another way of putting it is chiding another at the dinner table with: “Will you have rice or potatoes with that?” Some believe the staple food defines whether you are a local or not. (An Easterner must eat rice, if they don’t they’re a banana.) You may interpret this as a racial joke.
These are products of ethnic stereotyping, and is a form of peer pressure. This phenomenon probably happens everywhere in the world, using different terms, but with the safe modus operandi and motive.
Someone sees your liberal behavior, becomes jealous of it, and proceeds to make snide remarks about the person “not behaving as he/she should”. That you are not “living in a manner befitting your cultural heritage”.
These are the words of an ignorant hilly-billy.
Firstly, they fail to see what culture really is, and why they exist. Cultures are to an extent, dependent on geography and how connected a society is to another. Even if a group of people are of the same ancestry, they vary greatly in behavior, adapting to their current surroundings and who they connect with.
There is no exact template how anyone of a given ethnic origin should behave.
Some totalitarian nations take steps to censor what they call “Western-influences” (vice versa is unheard of) and moderate it according to their cultural sensitivities. Some may argue this is to protect national heritage, culture, language, and so on. How? Consider: You are exposed to a brand new language, someone you are able to familiarize and identify with this language more than what you have been speaking all your life; you are also comfortable with the culture of that language’s point of origin. Will this lead you to completely abandon your original language?
Simply because humans are populous, and not wholly connected, we will not have an absolute lingua franca.
Cultural spheres of Influence
You’ve probably heard of it, that is the East and West. It’s the notion that the world is halved by two completely different incompatible cultures. I beg to differ, they’re not incompatible, merely different. To have chosen to divide the East and West by a particular line, the author’s point of reference must have been in the middle of either of the two sides. Deviating from a central point until you perceive your hemisphere.
Another of interest is the North-South divide.
Opinion
Why should we maintain a culture we do not believe in? If another language has evolved that suits the purpose, why reinvent the wheel? Some may argue only a native language is capable of describing things in a given culture. That may be true for most cases. But a sufficiently evolved language should be able to encompass everything.
There exists a Universal Declaration of Human Rights. We should be able to choose how we behave, nobody can dictate forms by which we must behave. If you must argue, i have this to say: Don’t do unto others what you would not have done to oneself. What I mean is: Will you accept it if someone else told you not to act the way you are?
Enough said, so stop discriminating others.











